<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: [Jobs] Round-Up of Am Law 100 Lateral Positions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://recruiteresq.com/2009/12/jobs-round-up-of-am-law-100-lateral-positions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://recruiteresq.com/2009/12/jobs-round-up-of-am-law-100-lateral-positions/</link>
	<description>Legal Career Consulting &#38; Technology Training</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 20:35:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa</title>
		<link>http://recruiteresq.com/2009/12/jobs-round-up-of-am-law-100-lateral-positions/comment-page-1/#comment-596</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 20:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://recruiteresq.com/?p=1229#comment-596</guid>
		<description>Hi Jill:  I updated the spreadsheet so that the first page is a list of all of the firms.  If you want to refresh the page and/or &lt;a href=&quot;http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=tNzNPUhrUzsZFf1K-K5iyiA&amp;output=html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;visit the Google doc&lt;/a&gt;, try it out.  Let me know if you have any problems.

The Am Law 200 positions are listed in a &lt;a href=&quot;http://recruiteresq.com/2009/12/jobs-round-up-of-am-law-200-lateral-positions/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;separate post&lt;/a&gt;.  I&#039;m going to alternate between the two.  I&#039;ll probably update the Am Law 200 positions in a week or so.

Right now, I am going to stick with the Am Law 100 and Am Law 200 firms.  (...unless, for some reason, I get a ton of incoming donations. :-))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jill:  I updated the spreadsheet so that the first page is a list of all of the firms.  If you want to refresh the page and/or <a href="http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=tNzNPUhrUzsZFf1K-K5iyiA&#038;output=html" rel="nofollow">visit the Google doc</a>, try it out.  Let me know if you have any problems.</p>
<p>The Am Law 200 positions are listed in a <a href="http://recruiteresq.com/2009/12/jobs-round-up-of-am-law-200-lateral-positions/" rel="nofollow">separate post</a>.  I&#8217;m going to alternate between the two.  I&#8217;ll probably update the Am Law 200 positions in a week or so.</p>
<p>Right now, I am going to stick with the Am Law 100 and Am Law 200 firms.  (&#8230;unless, for some reason, I get a ton of incoming donations. <img src='http://recruiteresq.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill Levin</title>
		<link>http://recruiteresq.com/2009/12/jobs-round-up-of-am-law-100-lateral-positions/comment-page-1/#comment-595</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill Levin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://recruiteresq.com/?p=1229#comment-595</guid>
		<description>Hi Melissa,

Just tried Google docs for &quot;E-K&quot; and it didn&#039;t bring up chart. Overall it would be much easier if you could have the Google Chart include the whole alphabet, instead of breaking it up. Any plans to expand beyond the Top AmLaw 100. Top AmLaw 250? Thanks, Jill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Melissa,</p>
<p>Just tried Google docs for &#8220;E-K&#8221; and it didn&#8217;t bring up chart. Overall it would be much easier if you could have the Google Chart include the whole alphabet, instead of breaking it up. Any plans to expand beyond the Top AmLaw 100. Top AmLaw 250? Thanks, Jill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
